By Liesbet Heyvaert
The most aim of the publication is to give a scientific account of the constructional mechanisms that underlie deverbal nominalization. Such an account strongly demands a useful instead of basically structural process simply because nominalizations are essentially practical re-classifications of verbal predicates into nominal buildings. The argument is fortyfied via an in depth dialogue of a couple of nominalization platforms (i.e. deverbal -er nominalizations, gerundive nominals and that-nominalizations). This publication is of curiosity to all researchers in cognitive and useful linguistics.
Read Online or Download A Cognitive-Functional Approach to Nominalization in English PDF
Similar grammar books
This groundbreaking undergraduate textbook on glossy typical English grammar is the 1st to be in line with the innovative advances of the authors' prior paintings, The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (2002). The textual content is meant for college kids in schools or universities who've very little earlier historical past in grammar, and presupposes no linguistics.
Sleek English constructions is a transparent and available textual content that follows a structural method of educating easy English grammar. The e-book is split into 3 components: what a sentence constituent is, what a sentence constituent does, and the place a sentence constituent goes―Form, functionality, and place. the target of the ebook is to convey scholars to a greater knowing of sentence elements and sentence constructions, offering them with applicable terminology to debate those kinds and relationships.
First released in 2006. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa corporation.
First released in 1988, this booklet is anxious with the sure and indefinite articles in English. It offers an built-in pragmatic-semantic thought of sure and indefinite reference, at the foundation of which, many co-occurance regulations among articles and non-modifiers are defined. on the normal theoretical point, this ebook seems on the function of semantics within the prediction of all and in basic terms the grammatical sentences of a language.
- English Grammar in Use, New edition, With Answers - 2nd Edition (Intermediate Level)
- A Mink, a Fink, a Skating Rink: What Is a Noun?
- The Routledge Intermediate Dutch Reader (Routledge Modern Language Readers)
- Universal Grammar and Language Learnability
- Modern Dutch Grammar: A Practical Guide
- Literature About Language
Extra resources for A Cognitive-Functional Approach to Nominalization in English
This is true of, for instance, the schematic characterization of nomináis as 'grounded instances of some type'. Extension of the standard, on the other hand, implies that the target structure is only partially sanctioned by the standard or deviates from it. The standard is then conceived as the prototype of the category. It follows that a 'natural' approach to classification should not only look for schematic generalizations, but should also take account of the occurrence of prototypical and less prototypical instances of a class (Langacker 1987a: 371).
Examples of prototypical nomináis are this cup, some milk, a big house, those three black cats. Non-prototypical are nomináis such as three from Toledo, the poor, for Harold to resign·, they occur less frequently or "only in special grammatical circumstances" (Langacker 1991: 143). , that, these, some, any). 4. Composition and classification: Conclusion In short, a radically functional approach to composition gives priority to functions rather than to constituents and posits that an accurate description and classification of symbolic units has to be based on a functional analysis which includes the external and the internal functional organization of the unit in question.
As pointed out by Davidse (1998a), it has had a great impact on Halliday's thinking, and even though Halliday has never theorized much about agnation (Davidse 1998a: 287), his identification of system networks and, linked to it, of the various metafimctions, is based on inter-constructional relations. For one thing, the categories in his system networks essentially represent the proportionality of relations between constructions. As Halliday puts it, a category's label is "no more than the name of a proportional relation" between constructions (Halliday 1994: xxxii).